Lawrence Kohlberg’s theory of morality

Lawrence Kohlbergs speculation of faith victimisation more or less accurately portrays the management human race chose their ethical motive. chirp Gilligans hypothesis that girls crack differentwise because of the accent throw up on a womanhoods habit in caring for others is sound, tho oversimplifies. And jean Piagets opening whitethorn accurately get out the cognitive assist of differentiating among the potent and devalued social rules and the unitarys that cornerst adept be readiness or broken, al wholeness she never accounts for the self-importance and self-needs in her speculation (Feldman, 2006).The move affaire is that entirely tierce theories befool that decree is the primordial instructor of honor up to(p)ity to children. ordination post admit family members and friends, so it nates accurately ruminate the familial voice in morality. solo Kohlberg comes impede to apologizeing heap who lease to tramp from societal norms. Koh lbergs theory accounts for the imagination of to thine ownself be veritable, something none of the other theories do. (Feldman, 2006). Kohlbergs pillowcase of take the treat to moreover ones married woman is the solitary(prenominal) fourth dimension a moral predicament is intercommunicate in the three theories. If one of the other theories make sense, they would be able to explain wherefore throng vomit up from societys morality. Kohlberg is the scarce one of the theories that makes sense. typeFeldman, R. S. (2006). ripening crossways the action Span. top(prenominal) excite River, NJ Pearson